ResearchEnglishCreative Mindfulness

Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking

Authors: Lorenza S. Colzato, Ayca Ozturk and Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

The practice of meditation has seen a tremendous increase in the western world since the 60s. Scientific interest in meditation has also significantly grown in the past years; however, so far, it has neglected the idea that different type of meditations may drive specific cognitive-control states. In this study we investigate the possible impact of meditation based on focused-attention (FA) and meditation based on open-monitoring (OM) on creativity tasks tapping into convergent and divergent thinking. We show that FA meditation and OM meditation exert specific effect on creativity. First, OM meditation induces a control state that promotes divergent thinking, a style of thinking that allows many new ideas of being generated. Second, FA meditation does not sustain convergent thinking, the process of generating one possible solution to a particular problem. We suggest that the enhancement of positive mood induced by meditating has boosted the effect in the first case and counteracted in the second case.

Introduction

The aim of our study to evaluate the possibility that different types of meditation (OM vs. FA) induce or bias people toward particular cognitive-control states. OM meditation was assumed to induce a relatively “distributed” cognitive-control state that is characterized by weak top-down biasing of information processing and weak local competition among alternative thoughts, while FA meditation was assumed to induce a relatively focused cognitive-control state characterized by strong top-down control and strong local competition. If so, OM meditation practice would be expected to facilitate divergent thinking, as assessed by the AUT, but not convergent thinking. And this is exactly what the data show: individuals excel in the AUT task after the OM meditation.

Methods

Regarding creativity, Guilford (1950, 1967) has distinguished between two main ingredients of most creative activities: divergent and convergent thinking – even though other processes may also contribute (Wallas, 1926). Divergent thinking is taken to represent a style of thinking that allows many new ideas being generated, in a context where more than one solution is correct. The probably best example is a brainstorming session, which has the aim of generating as many ideas on a particular issue as possible. Guilford’s (1967) Alternate Uses Task (AUT) to assess the productivity of divergent thinking follows the same scenario: participants are presented with a particular object, such as a pen, and they are to generate as many possible uses of this object as possible. In contrast, convergent thinking is considered a process of generating one possible solution to a particular problem. It emphasizes speed and relies on high accuracy and logic. Mednick’s (1962) Remote Associates Task (RAT) that aims to assess convergent thinking fits with this profile: participants are presented with three unrelated words, such as “time,” “hair,” and “stretch,” and are to identify the common associate (“long”). Interestingly for our purposes, performance on the AUT and the RAT were found to be uncorrelated (Akbari Chermahini and Hommel, 2010) and differently affected by the same experimental manipulations (Hommel et al., submitted), which supports Guilford’s (1967) suggestion that convergent and divergent thinking represent different components of human creativity.

Discussion

(…) In any case, at least for divergent thinking we were able to show that meditation has a specific impact. This suggests that not all types of meditation have the same effect, which might explain why previous studies failed to provide unequivocal evidence for positive effects of meditation on creativity. Importantly, it also suggests that the benefits of OM meditation go beyond mere relaxation and receiving attention from a supervisor, which participants also received in the other two conditions. Apparently, OM practice restructures cognitive processing to a degree that is robust and general enough to affect performance in another, logically unrelated task. We suggest that this kind of practice reduces the degree of top-down control and local competition and, thus, leads to a broader distribution of potential resources. This establishes, or biases the individual toward a cognitive-control state that is less focused and “exclusive,” which facilitates jumping from one thought to another – as required in divergent thinking. This consideration fits with the observation of Slagter et al. (2007) that OM meditation leads to better performance in a distributed-attention task and reinforces the view that meditation practice can have a lasting and generalizable impact on human cognition (Lutz et al., 2008). (…)

Source

Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to Create: The Impact of Focused-Attention and Open-Monitoring Training on Convergent and Divergent Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116
PDF Download: Meditate to Create: The Impact of Focused-Attention and Open-Monitoring…

References

Akbari Chermahini S., Hickendorff M., Hommel B. (in press). Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associate Task: an item response theory approach. Think. Skills Creativity. [Epub ahead of print].10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.003 [Cross Ref]
Akbari Chermahini S., Hommel B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition 115, 458–465 [PubMed]
Akbari Chermahini S., Hommel B. (in press). Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychol. Res. [Epub ahead of print].10.1007/s00426-011-0358z [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Ball O. E. (1980). The Effect of TM and the TM-Sidhi Program on Verbal and Figural Creativity (TTCT), Auditory Creativity (S and I), and Hemispheric Dominance (SOLAT). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia
Bogacz R. (2007). Optimal decision-making theories: linking neurobiology with behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11, 118–12510.1016/j.tics.2006.12.006 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Brown D., Forte M., Dysart M. (1984a). Differences in visual sensitivity among mindfulness meditators and non-meditators. Percept. Mot. Skills 58, 727–73310.2466/pms.1984.58.3.727 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Brown D., Forte M., Dysart M. (1984b). Visual sensitivity and mindfulness meditation. Percept. Mot. Skills 58, 775–78410.2466/pms.1984.58.3.727 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Cahn B. R., Polich J. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol. Bull. 132, 180–21110.1037/0033-2909.132.2.180 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Chang V. Y., Palesh O., Cladwell R., Glasgow N., Abramson M., Luskin F., Gill M., Burke A., Koopman C. (2004). The effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on stress, mindfulness and self-efficacy, and positive states of mind. Stress Health 20, 141–14710.1002/smi.1011 [Cross Ref]
Chiesa A., Seretti A. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 15, 593–60010.1089/acm.2008.0416 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Colzato L. S., van Beest I., van den Wildenberg W. P. M., Scorolli C., Dorchin S., Meiran N., Borghi A. M., Hommel B. (2010a). God: do I have your attention? Cognition 117, 87–9410.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Colzato L. S., van Hooidonk L., van den Wildenberg W. P. M., Harinck F., Hommel B. (2010b). Sexual orientation biases attentional control: a possible gaydar mechanism. Front. Psychol. 1:13.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00013 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Colzato L. S., van den Wildenberg W., Hommel B. (2008). Losing the big picture: how religion may control visual attention. PLoS ONE 3, e3679.10.1371/journal.pone.0003679 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Cowger E. L. (1974). The effects of meditation (zazen) upon selected dimensions of personality development. Diss. Abstr. Int. 34(Pt 1), 4734
de Jager M. (2007). Een reis naar onafhankelijkheid met de kracht van ademen. Steenbergen: Inside-Out
Domino G. (1977). Transcendental meditation and creativity: an empirical investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 62, 358–36210.1037/0021-9010.62.3.358 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Duncan J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 820–82910.1038/35097575 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Guilford J. P. (1950). Creativity. Am. Psychol. 5, 444–45410.1037/h0063487 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Guilford J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
Hommel B. (2012). “Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search,” in Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain. Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 9, eds Todd P. M., Hills T. T., Robbins T. W., editors. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 215–230
Hommel B., Colzato L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: on the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon J. Relig. Sci. 45, 596–604
Horan R. (2009). The neuropsychological connection between creativity and meditation. Creat. Res. J. 21, 199–22210.1080/10400410902858691 [Cross Ref]
Kravitz J. (1996). Personal Transformation Seminar: Manual. Tilton: Transformational Breath Foundation, International Headquarters
Kravitz J. (2002). Breathe in, Laugh Loudly: The Joy of Transformational Breathing, Revised Edn Center Sandwich, NH: Free Breath Press
Lutz A., Greischar L., Rawlings N. B., Ricard M., Davidson R. J. (2004). Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude synchrony during mental practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16369–1637310.1073/pnas.0407401101 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Lutz A., Slagter H. A., Dunne J. D., Davidson R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 12, 163–16910.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Mednick S. (1962). The associative basis of creative problem solving process. Psychol. Rev. 69, 200–23210.1037/h0048850 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Murphy M., Donavon S. (1997). The Physical and Psychological Effects of Meditation: A Review of Contemporary Research with a Comprehensive Bibliography 1931–1996. Sausalito, CA: Institute of Noetic Sciences
Orme-Johnson D. W., Clements G., Haynes C. T., Badaoui K. (1977). “Higher states of consciousness: EEG coherence, creativity, and experiences of the sidhis,” in Scientific research on Maharishi’s Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi Program, Collected Papers, Vol. 1, eds Orme-Johnson D. W., Farrow J. T., editors. (New York: MERU Press; ), 705–712
Orme-Johnson D. W., Granieri B. (1977). “The effects of the age of enlightenment governor training courses on field independence, creativity, intelligence, and behavioral flexibility,” in Scientific Research on Maharishi’s Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi Program, Collected Papers, Vol. 1, eds Orme-Johnson D. W., Farrow J. T., editors. (New York: MERU Press; ), 713–718
Slagter H. A., Lutz A., Greischar L. L., Francis A. D., Nieuwenhuis S., Davis J. M., Davidson R. J. (2007). Mental training affects distribution of limited brain resources. PLoS Biol. 5, 138.10.1371/journal.pbio.0050138 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Wachholtz A. B., Pargament K. I. (2005). Is spirituality a critical ingredient of meditation? Comparing the effects of spiritual meditation, secular meditation, and relaxation on spiritual, psychological, cardiac, and pain outcomes. J. Behav. Med. 28, 369–38410.1007/s10865-005-9008-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
Wallas G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace